Legal Opinion

Duncan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 11, 1939No. 20466Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant has filed a very able brief on several questions in support of his motion for rehearing. We consider it unnecessary to discuss but one proposition, namely, the conduct of the jury in arriving at the verdict. In his original opinion, Judge Krueger announced as authority for his conclusion the case of Stockton v. State, 5 S. W. (2d) 996. It appeared to all the court at that time that this case was in point and decisive. Upon further examination of the record, however, we have concluded that while the two cases are remarkably similar in all of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Driver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Spicer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Stockton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Brookman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API