Legal Opinion

Hoerner Waldorf Corp. v. Bumstead-Woolford Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1972No. 12009PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE JAMES T. HARRISON

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment entered in the district court of Missoula County in favor of plaintiffs.

From the record it appears that the plaintiff Hoerner Waldorf Corporation was a defendant in an action brought by one Clarence Dutton for injuries sustained by him while he was employed by Bumstead-Woolford Company in the construction of a bleach plant at the Hoerner Waldorf pulp mill in Missoula, Montana. This action was settled by the insurance carriers for Hoerner Waldorf and thereafter they and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Four-Three-O-Six Duncan Corp. v. Security Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  2. State Bank v. PewMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Lesofski Ex Rel. Lesofski v. Ravalli County Electric Cooperative, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Lambert v. LambertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. North Fork Preservation Ass'n v. Department of State LandsMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Trengen v. MongeonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Knutson v. Bitterroot International System, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Clawson v. BerklundMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. B-Bar Tavern Inc. v. Prairie Mountain Bank (In re B-Bar Tavern Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API