Bissland v. Bankhead
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEHRING, Justice:
1 1 Petitioners are residents of Providence City, Utah, who seek to overturn by referendum an annexation ordinance. The Providence City recorder refused to approve the proposed referendum for placement on the ballot for the November 2007 vote. The recorder determined that Petitioners failed to submit their petition within forty-five days of the ordinanee's passage, as required by law. The district court agreed and granted summary judgment for Providence City. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶2 Members of the Providence City Council gathered on October 24, 2006, to consider an ordinance…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schaerrer v. Stewart's Plaza Pharmacy, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
- Citizen's Awareness Now v. MarakisUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Low v. City of MonticelloUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Tobias v. South Jordan City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Bigler v. VernonUtah Supreme Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Town of Oxford v. KosteCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Mellor v. Wasatch Crest Insurance Co. in LiquidationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- Olsen v. Park City Municipal Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- TAYLOR v. HEBER CITYCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026