State v. Groce
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Howell Circuit Court.— Hon. W. N. Evans, Judge. (1) The information is valid and sufficient. The first count was drawn under sec. 1847, R. S. 1899, and the second count under sec. 1848, R. S. 1899. The jury found the appellant guilty under the second count; therefore the first count is not before the court for consideration or review.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Howell Circuit Court.— Hon. W. N. Evans, Judge. (1) The information is valid and sufficient. The first count was drawn under sec. 1847, R. S. 1899, and the second count under sec. 1848, R. S. 1899. The jury found the appellant guilty under the second count; therefore the first count is not before the court for consideration or review. State v. Hendrickson, 165 Mo. 265; State v. Bond, 191 Mo. 568; State v. Havens, 95 Mo. 167; State v. Munson, 76 Mo. 109. (2) The appellant objected and saved his esceptions to the evidence of the deputy sheriff, that he arrested the appellant in…
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, P. J.
This prosecution originated in ITowell county, by the filing of an information in the circuit court, by the prosecuting attorney, in two counts. The first count charged an assault with intent to murder, under section 1847, Revised Statutes 1899', and the second count an offense under section 1848, Revised Statutes 1899. , The defendant was convicted under the second count and appeals.
The information charged that the defendant, on the 23d day of August, 1909', at the county of Howell, did .then and there willfully and feloniously make an assault upon one Harvey Redburn and then and there did…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. McMullinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
- State v. SublettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. HumfeldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914