Burling v. Burling
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
At common law, and in early years under the code, a plaintiff had the absolute right to- discontinue an action before or after issue joined and without leave of court. Bertschy v. McLeod, 32 Wis. 205, 210. Later decisions, however, recognize certain qualifications upon plaintiff’s right to discontinue. Leave to discontinue may be denied, in the discretion of the court, if the rights of defendant, third parties, or the public will be substantially prejudiced by discontinuance. State ex rel. Milwaukee v. Ludwig, 106 Wis. 226, 233, 82 N. W. 158; School District v. Clifcorn, 133 Wis. 465, 467,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. City of Milwaukee v. LudwigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Guinther v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Anderson v. Horlick's Malted Milk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Bertschy v. McLeodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Schulz v. SchulzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Monson v. MonsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
- Russell v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Freeman Printing Co. v. LuebkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. LeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Huth v. Public Service Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.