Legal Opinion

Sode v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 17, 1976No. 492-73PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurfee, Senior Judge

In this case of first impression, a former uniformed military service officer, presently a Federal civilian employee, retired from the service because of medical disability, argues that the 1964 amendments to the Dual Compensation Act1 provide an exemption to the retirement pay reduction pro*183visions of that Act2 for an officer medically retired because of contraction of a disabling disease in an armed conflict zone and that the Coast Guard Board for Correction of Military Records (BCMR) erred in holding to the contrary. On thorough consideration of the issue, the BCMR’s decision denying…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. 62 Cases of Jam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. McLean v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Steuer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  5. Mark M. Akins v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Duncan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  2. American President Lines, Ltd., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. United States, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. Ellen M. Kelly v. The United States, Rosemary J. McCarthy v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. Yankton Sioux Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  5. DoeUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API