Legal Opinion
Jenny Yoo Collection, Inc. v. Essense of Australia, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided January 17, 2020No. 2:17-cv-02666Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS JENNY YOO COLLECTION, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17-2666-JAR-GEB ESSENSE OF AUSTRALIA, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DESIGN PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION Plaintiff Jenny Yoo Collection, Inc. (“JY”) asserts claims against Defendant Essense of Australia, Inc. (“Essense”) for design patent infringement of the ’D120 Patent and ’D723 Patent (the “Design Patents”).1 This matter is before the Court on the parties’ competing briefs regarding claim construction of eight terms in the Design Patents, as supplemented, as well…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.