Legal Opinion

Weitzman v. Pottak

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCharles A. Loreto, J.

Motion to set aside the purported service of a summons, pursuant to sections 253 and 254 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law.

Section 253 requires, inter alia, that proof of service by mail upon a nonresident be supported by either the return receipt accompanying a registered letter or by the returned envelope showing that receipt of the letter was refused. Here the summons and complaint were mailed to defendant Marshak’s last-*53known address in Los Angeles, but the letter was returned, marked only “unclaimed”. The filing of this envelope, so marked, does not appear to be compliance with the statute.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bernardt v. ScianimanicoNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Harvey v. FussellNew York Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ellis v. RileyNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Grandison v. College Truck Renting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. YoungCivil Court of the City of New York · 1993
  4. Molter v. CarieriNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Free Cab Corp. v. FortCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API