Legal Opinion

Finlayson v. McDowell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 14, 1936No. 3381PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, Justice

(after stating the case as above).

The dismissal in the former suit as to Holland and the partnership did not abate the entire suit so as- to prevent recovery of judgment against Finlayson. Burton v. Roff (Tex.Com.App.) 292 S.W. 159; Fowler Comm. Co. v. Charles Land & Co. (Tex.Com.App.) 248 S.W. 314.

The petition in the former suit was based upon an alleged tort for which the partnership was liable, and the authorities cited also announce the settled rule in this state that partnership obligations bind the individual members severally as well as jointly.

The amended petition in the former suit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. ClippingerTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Fowler Commission Co. v. Charles Land & Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Burton v. RoffTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  4. Whittinghill v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Griswold v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API