Legal Opinion

Nee v. Dixon

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 20, 1991No. A91A0029PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Chief Judge.

Mary Lou Fouts Nee brought suit against John Wesley Dixon to recover damages for injuries allegedly incurred in an automobile collision. The trial court granted summary judgment to Dixon on the ground that Nee had not exercised due diligence in effecting service of process before the statute of limitation expired. Nee appeals.

The collision at issue occurred on July 16, 1987. The police report listed appellee’s address as 3979 Majestic Drive, S. W., Atlanta, Georgia 30331. Appellant mailed a letter to appellee at that address sometime in 1988, and he then talked with her…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walker v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Ingram v. GroseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cantin v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Zeigler v. HambrickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Strickland v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Carmody v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Robison v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API