Legal Opinion
Bucktail, LLC v. County Council
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 27, 1999No. 38, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
In this appeal a real estate developer contends that Talbot County (the County) erroneously denied its application for a growth allocation under the Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Protection Program. For the reasons set forth below we shall hold that there was procedural error that requires a remand to the Talbot County Council (the Council).
I
In 1984, the General Assembly enacted the Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Protection Program (the Program). Chapter 794 of the Acts of 1984, codified as amended in Maryland Code (1974, 1990 Repl.Vol., 1998 Cum.Supp.), §§ 8-1801 through 8-1817…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's CounselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Heaps v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Department of Natural Resources v. Linchester Sand & Gravel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Maryland Aviation Administration v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Spencer v. Maryland State Board of PharmacyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Maryland Transportation Authority v. KingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Maryland Overpak Corporation v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Board of License Commissioners v. Corridor Wine, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.