Legal Opinion

Tufts v. Matthews

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island

Decided March 4, 1882PublishedCited by 4 opinions

At Law.

1Opinion of the Court

Colt, D. J.

This is an action for deceit. Tlie defendants bave demurred to the declaration. The main question raised by the demurrer is whether an action of deceit is assignable. The facts alleged, so far as it is found necessary to state them, are as follows:

One Nathan Matthews, of .Boston, was adjudicated a bankrupt upon petition filed August 90, 1878, and assignees were duly appointed. On December 19,1879, tlie assignees sold all tlie assets of the bankrupt remaining in their hands, and all their rights of action against the defendants, to Benjamin F. Brooks; and on January 22,1880, Edwin…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Comegys v. VasseSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. The United States v. James and John G. Daniel, Executors of Beverly Daniel, Late U. S. MarshalSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  3. Henshaw v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  4. Va. & Tenn. R. R. v. SayersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1875
  5. Dickinson v. SeaverMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Hillsboro Garden TractsOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Tamm v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  3. In re GayDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1910
  4. Bonvillain v. American Sugar Refining Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API