Legal Opinion · Dissent

Townsend Fruit Co. v. Mayo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 6, 1957No. 19Published

1DissentPleus, Judge

It is with the utmost reluctance tiiat I find it necessary to render my first dissent. Were the matters involved not as fundamental as they appear to me to be, I would merely note such dissent. However, in view of what I conceive to be a further erosion upon the judicial power by an extension of the limits heretofore imposed upon administrative action by our Supreme Court, I feel constrained to note my reasons.

The importance of such administrative regulation as may be imposed by the legislature upon citrus fruit dealers for the benefit of this industry so vital to our state cannot be made to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. De Groot v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. State Ex Rel. Paoli v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  3. Carnegie v. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  4. Kashin v. Food FairSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API