Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tenner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 12, 1988No. 1016PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s petition for relief under the Post Conviction Hearing Act (“PCHA”) which alleged that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to demonstrate at a Rule 1100 hearing, via documentary evidence, that the Commonwealth had failed to exercise due diligence. We affirm the denial of the petition.

On January 7, 1978, appellant and an accomplice forced entry into the home of Mildred Clark and bound and gagged her, threatened to kill her, stabbed her five times, and fled with her cash and jewelry. As a result, law enforcement officials…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BuehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. CrowleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. SlavikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. ForestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. BerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Com. v. Freemore, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Com. v. Hoffman, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API