People v. Campbell
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court 1
Docket No. 94425–Agenda 5–September 2003.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellee, v. RICHARD D. CAMPBELL, JR., Appellant.
Opinion filed December 18, 2003.
2Opinion of the Court · ThomasJustice Thomas
At issue in this case is whether defense counsel, by stipulating to the admission of evidence, can waive a defendant’s constitutional right to confront the source of the evidence without the defendant’s knowing consent to the stipulation. The appellate court, with one justice dissenting, held that defense counsel can stipulate to prosecution testimony without a defendant’s knowing consent because the decision to stipulate is a matter of…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
3Cases cited27 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.