Legal Opinion
State v. Glidden
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 24, 1983No. 82-010PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
In this accomplice-to-first-degree-murder case, we consider multiple issues including the validity of the indictment, the admission of certain evidence, objections to the instructions to the jury, the sufficiency of the evidence, and the failure to grant a mistrial. We affirm the defendant’s conviction.
The defendant, Raymond E. Glidden, was indicted for acting as an accomplice to Freddy Comtois in the first-degree murder of Steven Mitchell, see RSA 630:1-a; RSA 626:8,111(a), in that he
“did, with the purpose of facilitating the first degree murder . . . , aid Comtois in committing the said…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Roberts v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. WentworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- Johnston v. LynchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- State v. PortigueSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- State v. LemireSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.