Legal Opinion
New York Public Interest Research Group Straphangers Campaign v. Reuter
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 7, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rubin, J.
At issue on this appeal is whether Public Authorities Law § 1205 (5) requires respondents New York City Transit Authority, its president and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (collectively, the TA) to give public notice, conduct a public hearing and obtain the approval of a majority of its board of directors prior to eliminating or reducing the hours during which 53 of its token booths are staffed. Because the legislative history of the measure indicates that it is intended to be remedial, this Court affirms the expansive interpretation accorded to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Tompkins v. . HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Blanco v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Lincoln First Bank v. RupertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Lesser v. Park 65 Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bryant v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 2004
- New York Public Interest Research Group Straphangers Campaign, Inc. v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 2003
- Matter of Tucker v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Matter of Tucker v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Samuelsen v. WalderNew York Supreme Court · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.