Legal Opinion

Miller v. Baird

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided February 2, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 724PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEESE, District Judge.

This is an action for personal injuries. The plaintiff initiated his claim in a state court and the defendants removed the action to this court, 28 U.S.C. § 1441 (b). The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds of (1) the insufficiency of process, (2) the insufficiency of service of process, and (3) the failure of the complaint to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

The motor vehicle collision out of which this action arose occurred on July 12, 1963 in Franklin County, Tennessee. The plaintiff filed his original declaration and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Anderson v. OutlandTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Red Top Trucking Corp. v. Seaboard Freight Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  4. O'Donnell v. Richardson-Allen Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1964
  5. Proctor v. HendrickDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cass v. Sonnenblick-Goldman Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Sorsby v. TurnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Sorsby v. TurnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API