Legal Opinion

(SS) Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 10, 2025No. 2:21-cv-01563Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Luis Ortiz, No. 2:21-cv-01563 KJIM-DMC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. Commissioner of Social Security, 1S Defendant. 16 17 Luis Ortiz brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for review of a decision by the 18 | Commissioner of Social Security (the Commissioner). The Commissioner denied him benefits 19 | based on an administrative law judge’s (ALJ) decision that he was not “disabled” under the Social 20 | Security Act. See Admin. Record (AR) at 25-35, ECF No. 14-1. Both Ortiz and the government 21 |…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Robbins v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Chiad SAELEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API