Mergendoller v. Mergendoller
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff and appellant complains that upon awarding her a decree of divorce from defendant the court limited her alimony allowance to a period of six months and set aside an automobile to her husband as his separate property.
An allowance for the support of a wife may be made for such period “as the court may deem just, having regard to the circumstances of the parties”. (Civ. Code, sec. 139.) “Unless there is a manifest abuse of discretion, the higher court has no authority to interfere.” (Lamborn v. Lamborn, 80 Cal. App. 494 [251 Pac. 943, 945]; Duffey v. Duffey, 79 Cal.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lamborn v. LambornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Gamache v. South School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Duffey v. DuffeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jones v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953