Legal Opinion

Warren v. Parkhurst

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1904PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Demurrer to complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Kellogg, John M., J.

The plaintiff brings this action against the defendants, twenty-six mill owners on the Cuyadutta creek above him, alleging that each upon his own premises, for the last six years, has been discharging sewage and other foul matters into the creek; that while the damage committed by each defendant in itself is merely nominal, that the stench arising from the creek thus polluted by all of them greatly injures the enjoyment and healthfulness of his premises, and he asks an injunction and $1,000 damages. Various of the defendants demur upon the ground that the complaint does…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chipman v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Strobel v. . Kerr Salt Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Meyer v. . PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Warren v. City of GloversvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Bear v. SnyderNew York Supreme Court · 1834

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of New York v. A-1 Jewelry & Pawn, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Acusport, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  3. NAACP v. AcuSport, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  4. Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  5. City of New York v. A-1 Jewelry & Pawn, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API