Legal Opinion
Wood v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 18, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from tlie Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
1Opinion of the Court
SHIPMAN, Circuit Judge.
The facts in the case are undisputed. Wood & Payson exported from Russia 513 bales of Donskoi wool, of the third class, upon which the proper rate of duty under the tariff act of October 1, 1890, was 32 per cent, ad valorem. The other facts are succinctly stated by the board of general appraisers as follows:
*255"(1) The shipment of the goods covered by this protest was made from Russia on or about December 1, J891. (2) The merchandise arrived in the United States, and was entered for consumption, January 8, 1892. (3) The merchandise was purchased and invoiced in silver…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cramer v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- United States v. KlingenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Hadden v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- The Collector v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Heinemann v. Arthur's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
3Cited by4 opinions
- Downs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1902
- United States v. J. Allston Newhall & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1899
- Fry v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. KnauthU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1896