Legal Opinion
H. B. Humphrey Co. v. Pollack Roller Runner Sled Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 2, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The corporate defendant (hereafter called the defendant) is indebted to the plaintiff in a substantial sum on a judgment rendered in an action for indebtedness incurred prior to January 1, 1928. The present suit is brought to recover the amount of that judgment from three" individuals who were directors of the defendant, because of certain false statements in the certificate of condition of the defendant filed in March, 1928. The only issue now material relates to a statement in that certificate of condition to the effect that the amount of stock issued and outstanding at the date of the last…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Hanscom v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Ettor v. City of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Calkins v. Wire Hardware Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Crimmins & Peirce Co. v. Kidder Peabody Acceptance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Standard Oil Co. of New York v. Back Bay Hotels Garage, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Morin v. StrombergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Meier v. First Citizens Bankers Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Orvis v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.