Legal Opinion · Dissent

Richeson v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1983No. Claim No. 66543Published

1Dissent

Bloom and Lynch, JJ.,

dissent in a memorandum by Lynch, J., as follows: We dissent and would reverse and deny the claimant permission to file a late notice of claim. The claimant was injured when her vehicle encountered road construction on Ninth Avenue near 28th Street. The date was April 13, 1979. The construction was by the State of New York. Hence, the claimant had 90 days in which to file a notice of intention of a personal injury claim (Court of Claims Act, § 10, subd 3). The claimant, however, filed a notice of claim with the City of New York, assuming that it was the city’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Erca v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Erca v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Gatti v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Innis v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Hurwitz v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API