Legal Opinion
Craig v. Central West Public Service Co.
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided January 2, 1934No. Nos. 1289, 1290PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOHOE, District Judge.
The subject-matter of these two suits is the same. In the Craig ease the question of venue is involved. In the Kirkpatrick case jurisdiction and venue is conceded. We have concluded on our own motion to consolidate these actions, and consequently need not consider the question of venue at this time.
• An exhaustive hearing on the objections of the defendant company and of the interveners to the appointment of a temporary receiver has been had. Voluminous briefs of the parties have been filed and oral arguments made'! We think that the questions raised, pertaining to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Quincy, Missouri & Pacific Railroad v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Brown v. Lake Superior Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Sage v. Memphis & Little Rock RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- St. Joseph & St. Louis Railroad v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Andrews v. Andrews & Andrews, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1942
- Touchett v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1947