Dalbkermeyer v. Scholtes
South Dakota Supreme Court
Action by C. H. Dalbkermeyer against Nicholas Scholtes and Laurenz Halbritter. There was judgment for defendants, and plaintiff’s appeal was dismissed. From a taxation of costs plaintiff appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBennett, J.
In the above matter the appellant appeals from the action of the clerk of the supreme court-in the taxation of •costs in the case of Dalbkermeyer v. Scholtes, 52 N. W. Rep. 261, wherein the appeal was dismissed at this term, for the reason that it was not authorized by the appellant. The judgment of dismissal was entered June 2, 1892. The costs on the appeal were taxed by-the clerk of this court on the 9th day of June, and respondents were allowed .the following as their costs: .
Before argument........................................ $5.00
For argument.........................................…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dalbkermeyer v. ScholtesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ryan v. MaxeyMontana Supreme Court · 1895
- Kelly v. OksallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Sioux Hudson-Essex Co. v. Iowa Guarantee Mortgage Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Swenson v. ChristophersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897