Legal Opinion

Commercial Bank v. Toklas

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1899No. 2914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon.. E. D. Benson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

Plaintiff and appellant seeks by this action-to recover the amount alleged to he due on a promissory-note made by the defendants and respondents, of which, the following is a copy:

“$1,970.30. Seattle, April 20, 1891. Three months, after date we promise to pay to the order of E. Holland & Co. nineteen hundred seventy 30-100 dollars, at 17 6’ Horth Water St., Bochester, H. Y, value received. Toklas,, Singerman & Co.”

*37This note was, before maturity, indorsed by Holland & Co., and discounted by the appellant in the regular course of business. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Yellowstone National Bank v. GagnonMontana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Jones v. TurpinTennessee Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kubey v. Coast Athletic ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API