Legal Opinion

Gill v. Michelin North America, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided September 17, 2013No. EP-13-CA-219-FMPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND

FRANK MONTALVO, District Judge.

On this day, the court considered Plaintiff Chad S. Gill and Plaintiff Dakota James Gill’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) “Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint” (“Motion for Leave”) [ECF No. 3], filed August 5, 2013; “Plaintiffs [sic] Motion to Remand” (“Motion to Remand”) [ECF No. 4], filed August 5, 2013; and Defendant Michelin North America, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “MNA”) “Defendant Michelin North America, Inc.’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Acuna v. Brown & Root Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  2. Crown Life Insurance Company v. CasteelTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. St. Paul Reinsurance Company, Ltd. v. Larry GreenbergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  4. Adrian Cavallini v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. Hensgens v. Deere & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Palmquist v. Hain Celestial GroupCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
  2. Howard v. Lowe's Home Ctrs., LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2018
  3. Cinco Bayous, LLC v. Samson Exploration, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2020
  4. Coan v. Cooper Tire & Rubber CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2025
  5. Mike Dunn, Mark Newsom, Michael Newsom, Sean McPherson, and Mary McPherson v. Polaris Industries Inc., Polaris Inc., Glover Enterprises, LLC, and John R. GloverDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API