Mulry v. Mohawk Valley Insurance
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBigelow, J.
The defendants in this case relied at the trial upon two grounds of defence to the claim of the plaintiff under his policy. One was, that the premises, after the policy was made, and at the time of the fire, were used for the sale of spirituous liquors, contrary to an express stipulation on the part of the plaintiff; and that the policy was thereby rendered void. *542This ground of defence was fully stated in the answer of the defendants, and the question of fact arising thereon was submitted to the jury, who returned their verdict on this point in favor of the plaintiff.
The other ground of…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Creekmore v. WoodardTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
- Caliri v. William K. Millar Associates, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1985