Legal Opinion

State v. Gaughan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1995No. 94-CA-24PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harsha, Judge.

Daniel Gaughan, appellant, appeals from the judgment of the Washington County Court of Common Pleas finding him guilty of aggravated assault, a violation of R.C. 2903.12(A)(2), with both a gun and physical harm specifications. Appellant presents the following assignment of error for our review:

“The trial court improperly sentenced the defendant to a definite term of incarceration of three years for a gun specification.”

Appellant was indicted on one count of felonious assault in violation of R.C. 2903.12(A)(1), two counts of felonious assault in violation of R.C. 2903.12(A)(2),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DeemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. LytleOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. ColemanOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Moore, Unpublished Decision (10-29-1999)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State v. Moore, Unpublished Decision (10-29-1999)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API