In re Estate of Murphy
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 178, Oct. T., 1897, by Ann M. Kurtz et al., from decree of O. C. Allegheny Co., June T., 1897, No. 115, dismissing exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication. The facts appear by the opinion of the court below which was as follows: William R. Murphy died testate on April 18, 1896. By his will dated July 12, 1894, he made the following provisions for his wife, who died prior to him, to wit: on September 29,1895: “ Second.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 178, Oct. T., 1897, by Ann M. Kurtz et al., from decree of O. C. Allegheny Co., June T., 1897, No. 115, dismissing exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication. The facts appear by the opinion of the court below which was as follows: William R. Murphy died testate on April 18, 1896. By his will dated July 12, 1894, he made the following provisions for his wife, who died prior to him, to wit: on September 29,1895: “ Second. I will and bequeath to my wife, Matilda T. Murphy, the sum of Five thousand ($5,000) dollars, and one hundred and fifty (150) shares of the stock of…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
We find nothing in this record that requires a reversal or modification of the decree from which this appeal was taken; nor do we think that any of the questions presented in the specifications of error require further notice than is taken of them in the opinion of the learned judge who entered the decree.
On his opinion, the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.
2Cited by15 opinions
- Busser v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Thompson WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Dulles's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Funk EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Thompson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.