Legal Opinion

R. E. Morris Investments, Inc. v. Lind

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 15, 1981No. 64645PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLBEE, Justice.

This interlocutory appeal presents the question whether a trial court can, pursuant to Iowa R.Civ.P. 134(b)(2), strike a demand for jury trial as a sanction for failure to comply with a discovery order. We conclude that such action is not available as a discovery sanction.

The action from which this appeal arises was instituted by plaintiffs R. E. Morris Investments and R. E. Morris Co., Inc. (Morris) in October 1978. In essence, Morris alleged the breach of an agreement for the purchase of a retail hardware business and of a commercial lease by defendants John and Charma Lind…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Haumersen v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co. v. RoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  2. Sullivan v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Renze Hybrids, Inc. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  4. Suckow v. Boone State Bank & Trust, Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  5. Carter v. Wiese Corp.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API