Legal Opinion

Eberline Oilfield Service, Inc. v. Eberline

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided May 17, 2022No. 1:18-cv-00245Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA Eberline Oilfield Service, Inc., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO ) COMPEL IN PART AND DENYING vs. ) MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER ) WITHOUT PREJUDICE Chad Eberline and All in One ) Oil Field Service, Inc., ) Case No. 1:18-cv-245 ) Defendants. ) Before the Court is Plaintiff Eberline Oilfield Service, Inc.’s (“EOS”) Motion to Compel Under Rule 37 and for Sanctions. Also before the Court is defendants’ Cross Motion for Protective Order. For the reasons that follow, EOS’s motion is granted in part and denied in part and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Gaylon Hofer v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  3. St. Paul Reinsurance Co. v. Commercial Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
  4. Gowan v. Mid Century InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2015
  5. Jo Ann Howard & Associates, P.C. v. CassityDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API