Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lassiter v. Alabama A & M University

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 17, 1994No. 92-6295Published

1ConcurrenceBarkett, Circuit Judge

I concur in the result only.

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part in which HATCHETT, Circuit Judge, joins:

I agree with the majority opinion insofar as it concludes that the district court did not err in granting the defendants qualified immunity on the issue of whether the personnel policy manual created a property interest. I do not agree, however, with the majority’s resolution of the due process claim based upon a property interest created by the contract. Therefore, I respectfully dissent on that issue.

The contract between Lassiter and the university has been…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ed Rich v. Larry C. DollarCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  3. McDonald v. U.S. Die Casting and Dev.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Swint v. City Of WadleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Lassiter v. CovingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API