Legal Opinion

Douglas v. Harris

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 26, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

63 N.J. Super. 313 (1960)

164 A.2d 602

VIOLA DOUGLAS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

CHARLES HARRIS AND MARY JOHNSON, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 19, 1960.

Decided October 26, 1960.

Before Judges CONFORD, FOLEY and MINTZ.

Mr. Howard T. Rosen argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Emanuel Needle, of counsel).

Mr. Joseph E. Zavesky argued the cause for defendant-respondent Charles Harris (Messrs. Mead, Gleeson, Hansen & Pantages, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by MINTZ, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

Plaintiff appeals from a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ohio Central R. Co. v. Central Trust Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Greenfield v. DusseaultNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  3. Wormack v. HowardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Greenfield v. DusseaultSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  5. Interchemical Corp. v. Uncas Printing & Fin. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schlosser v. KragenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  2. Fox v. FoxNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  3. Minardi v. NocitoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API