Legal Opinion

Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co. v. Barr

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 23, 1929No. 1845Published

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This suit was instituted by appellee in justice court against appellant for damages for negligently killing one of his mules. Appellee valued his mule at §150, and also asked for §20 attorney’s fees. Upon trial in the justice court appellee offered no evidence, and judgment was accordingly for appellant. He then appealed his ease to the county court, where the case was tried without written pleadings. We take the following statement of the nature and result "of that trial from appellee’s brief:

“That on October 10,1927, the appellee was living near the E. & W. tracks within 35 or 40 feet of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. BuiceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API