Legal Opinion

Searcy v. Vilsack

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 14, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2023-3166Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HENRY SEARCY, JR., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:23-cv-03166 (TNM) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Henry Searcy, Jr., proceeding pro se, sues officials at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) based on alleged mistreatment while he worked there. Because Searcy brings solely common law tort claims against officials acting in the scope of their employment, the United States has been substituted as Defendant. 1 The Government moved to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. This motion is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  4. Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Mathirampuzha v. PotterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API