Legal Opinion

Succession of Kunemann

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 18, 1905No. 15,863PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Thomas C. W. Ellis, Judge. In the matter of the succession of Jules Joseph Kunemann. On the filing by the administratrix of a final accounting of administration, the widow of deceased filed an opposition, and from a dismissal of the same appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtNicholls, J.

Jules J. Kunemann died intestate in New Orleans on the 28th of February, 1894, leaving a widow, but no children and a mother. His succession was not opened until the 21st of July, 1904, when, reciting the fact of his death and her relationship to him, the mother applied to be appointed administratrix thereof. No opposition having been made, she was so appointed, and received letters as such on the 7th of July of that year. •

An inventory of the property of the succession on the 1st of July, 1904, was made. The only asset figuring on that inventory was described as “a certain claim of 63 shares…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Richard v. LazardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  2. Rogge v. NouvetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
  3. Succession of PiffetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
  4. Arrowsmith v. GordonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1848
  5. Succession of RobertsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1876

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Malone v. CannonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  2. Succession of GuillonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. Succession of AndrusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  4. Succession of LichtentagSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  5. Succession of PelloatSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API