Legal Opinion

Koch v. Moyer and Burkhart

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1931No. Appeal 95PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The appellant, Dr. Burkhart, became surety for Moyer on a bond given to Mrs. Koch to secure the performance of a contract for building a house. The bond contained a warrant of attorney authorizing the confession of judgment against the contractor and his surety. Averring a default in the performance of the contract, judgment was confessed by an attorney in favor of Mrs. Koch against Moyer and Burkhart, respectively, for $1,050.65, with interest from December 9, 1925. A petition to open the judgment was presented by the defendants in which they alleged full and complete…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bensinger v. WrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  2. Blauvelt v. KemonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. Nesbitt v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Barclay v. DeckerhoofSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  5. Commonwealth Building & Loan Ass'n v. SteeleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. J.F. Walker Co. v. Excalibur Oil Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Continental Bank v. AxlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Flanaghan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API