Legal Opinion

Eckert v. Triplett

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1874PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Clay Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

This was an action by the appellant, as administrator de bonis non, with the will annexed, of the estate of Henry R. Hice, deceased, against the appellee, to recover the value of certain personal property alleged to have been sold by the deceased in his lifetime to the appellee.

The appellee answered in two paragraphs: First, the general denial; and, second, a settlement with and payment to Samuel Hice, a former administrator with the will annexed of the estate of said Henry R. Hice.

Reply in denial. Trial by jury and verdict for appellee, motion for a new trial by the appellant overruled, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Emerson v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1820

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hebel v. Conrail, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Brown & Bros. v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
  3. Clouser v. RuckmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Cato v. MayesIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Slade v. LeonardIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API