Legal Opinion
Huntsman Farms, Inc. v. Espy
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided January 4, 1996No. LR-C-94-507PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROY, District Judge.
The instant case is an action for judicial review under the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701, et seq., and seeks a determination that certain decisions by the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service (“ASCS”) of the United States Department of Agriculture pertaining to eligibility for and payment under the Payment Limitation Regulations, 7 C.F.R. Part 795, were arbitrary and capricious.
More specifically, the complaint indicates that the plaintiffs are seeking a declaratory judgment that:(1) Wesley Huntsman is a “separate person” as defined by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Don Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Davidson v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Bateman Co. v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2000