Carson City v. Capital City Entertainment, Inc.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*417OPINION ON REHEARING
2Per curiam
On September 20, 2001, we issued an order of affirmance in this matter. Subsequently, appellant filed a rehearing petition, to which respondents filed answers. After reviewing the parties’ submissions, as well as the briefs and appendix, we concluded that rehearing was warranted, and we granted the petition. We now withdraw our September 20, 2001 order and issue this opinion in its place.
Under NRS 278.480, a property owner may petition the municipality to abandon an abutting street. The property owner need not pay to acquire his or her proportionate part of the abandoned…
3Cases cited24 opinions
- Stark v. StarrsSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Wirth v. BransonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. Whited & Wheless, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Hotel Riviera, Inc. v. TorresNevada Supreme Court · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- City of Las Vegas v. Cliff Shadows Professional Plaza, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Winnie Development, LLLP v. RevelingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- In re Search Warrants re Seizure of Docs.Court of Appeals of Nevada · 2023
- In re Search Warrants re Seizure of Docs.Nevada Supreme Court · 2023
- Schiller v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.