Legal Opinion

Readmond v. Matsushita Electric Corp. of America

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 1973No. Civ. A. 70-663, 70-1156 and 70-1350PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HANNUM, District Judge.

In the present actions plaintiffs allege that defendant, Matsushita Electric Corp. of America, (Matsushita) breached their oral contracts of employment. Plaintiffs’ actions are brought “on the contract” demanding vindication of their expectation interests. Before the Court are defendant’s motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b), Fed.R.Giv.P., and defendant’s Rule 12(f) motion to strike new matter in each plaintiff’s answer to defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

The pertinent facts as set forth in the complaints and answers to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Wheeler v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. U.F.C.W. Local 56 Health & Welfare Fund v. J.D.'s MarketDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
  2. Azriel v. Frigitemp CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Taylor v. Canteen Corp.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1992
  4. Philadelphia Facilities Management Corp. v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. PERONACE v. KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API