Legal Opinion

Bank One Texas, N.A. v. Ameritrust Texas, N.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 7, 1993No. 05-92-01324-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARBER, Justice.

Ameritrust Texas sought to probate a will. It moved for declaratory judgment that it was the proper executor of the will under the Texas Substitute Fiduciary Act (the Act). Bank One answered and counterclaimed for declaratory judgment that it was the proper executor. Both parties moved for summary judgment. The probate court granted Ameritrust’s motion for summary judgment and denied Bank One’s motion for summary judgment. Bank One appeals. We affirm the probate court’s judgment.

SUMMARY OF FACTS

Testator Mussler, by his will dated March 25, 1986, appointed MBank Dallas,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Clements v. FashingSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Segal v. RochelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. City of Mason v. West Texas Utilities Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wood v. Victoria Bank & Trust Co., NA, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
  2. Dirk Lee Bryan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1991
  3. Gary Reed Walp v. Connie Hunter, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
  4. James Lawrence Wood v. Victoria Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
  5. James Lawrence Wood v. Victoria Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API