Legal Opinion

State v. Coley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 16, 1974No. 7419SC628PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BALEY, Judge.

Defendant contends that the court did not adequately explain to the jury the elements of the offense of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and did not instruct the jury with respect to the lesser included offense of non-felonious breaking and entering.

The State’s evidence placed defendant in the house after the break-in. Window panes were broken and glass scattered on the floor. Three bags of frozen food had been removed from a freezer and packed ready to be carried out. Defendant’s companion had a package of frozen food in his pocket as he and defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DuboiseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. McIntyreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. GurkinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. McIntyreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BrandonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API