Legal Opinion

Kawczynski v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed on the facts and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the finding of the jury that the insured was in sound health on the date of the policy, April 10, 1933, is against the weight of the evidence. Two theories of recovery were submitted to the jury and the general verdict leaves it inconclusive as to the theory upon which the verdict was founded. A reversal must be had if either theory is unsupported by adequate evidence. (Tryon v. Willbank, 234 App. Div. 335; Cohen v. Jaffe, 218 id. 259; Perham v. Cottle, 98 Misc. 48; affd.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tryon v. WillbankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Perham v. CottleNew York Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wood v. Webster Paper & Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. Le Glaire v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API