De Michele v. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Second District; Hon. J. A. Howell, Judge. Action by P. DeMiehele against the London & Lancashire Pire Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, C. J.
This action was brought to recover upon an insurance policy -issued by appellant to insure respondent’s property against loss by fire to the amount of $1000. Respondent, in his complaint, in substance, alleged' the issuance and delivery of the policy to him by appellant; that during the life of the policy a fire occurred by which the property covered by the policy was destroyed, to his damlage in the sum of $1000; that he had complied with all of the conditions of the policy, and that the appellant had failed to do so-, wherefore he asked judgment for the amount of the damages. Appellant, in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Griffith v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Harnden v. Milwaukee Mechanics' InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Vesey v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Berliner v. Travelers' Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- James Manufacturing Co. v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1964
- Elias v. Boone Timber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
- Burdick v. California Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1931
- American Surety Co. of New York v. Gilmore Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- De Groot v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.