Legal Opinion

Hamilton Nat. Bank v. District of Columbia

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 31, 1949No. 9833-9840Published

1Opinion of the Court

176 F.2d 624 (1949)

HAMILTON NAT. BANK OF WASHINGTON

v.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and seven other cases.

Nos. 9833-9840.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued March 23, 1949.

Decided May 31, 1949.

Mr. Roger J. Whiteford, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Philip S. Peyser, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 9833.

Messrs. Harry L. Walker, Assistant Corporation Counsel, District of Columbia, and George C. Updegraff, Assistant Corporation Counsel, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Vernon E. West, Corporation Counsel, and Chester H. Gray, Principal Assistant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sims v. RivesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  2. Hamilton Nat. Bank v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  3. Hamilton Nat. Bank v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  4. Lappin v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1903
  5. Smoot Sand & Gravel Corp. v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API