Legal Opinion

Bunn v. Lett

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Charles H. Bunn against Margaret M. Lett to recover damages on a contract. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff by direction of the court the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

The number of frivolous and untenable objections raised upon this appeal for the purpose of overturning the judgment clearly indicate to us, as they did undoubtedly to the learned trial judge, that the defenses interposed were without merit, and the object sought delay. We regret, under these circumstances, to be obliged to interfere with the judgment. But one question is presented, which, though to some extent technical, can be made available in obtaining a further delay, which apparently is the object sought by the defendant. From the facts, it appears that the defendant owned the premises…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hills v. . PlaceNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Wolcott v. Van SantvoordNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  3. Caldwell v. CassidyNew York Supreme Court · 1828

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. . StoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Oaks v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Oaks v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. Packard v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906
  5. Heinemann v. BraschNew York Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API