Carpenter v. Whitley County Plan Commission
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION
Staton, P.J.
I dissent from the majority opinion since it has misinterpreted IC 1971, 18-7-5-19 which clearly provides for-a quorum to transact the business of the Commission “at a regular *421or properly called special meeting. . . .” Therefore, Braughton v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals (1970), 146 Ind. App. 652, 257 N.E.2d 8391 would apply, since a “prior and legally effective determination . . .” has been made by the Commission. I would reverse the trial court’s judgment.
The statute, IC 1971, 18-7-5-19, provides:
“QUORUM — Number required for official action. — A…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Bynum v. LaPorte Superior Court No. 1Indiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Braughton v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
- James R. v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Cordial v. GrimmIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Matter of McGovern (Olson)New York Court of Appeals · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.